Constitutional Land Reform: Alternatives to Confiscation and Land Retribution

LF7

FMF Policy Agenda

Summary

Security of property is an unavoidable precondition for a flourishing and free society – but so is the possibility of expanding access to property rights and the restoration of dispossessed property. Properly conceived, there is no tension between land reform and protection of private property, which is what section 25 of the South African Constitution bears out. This report considers the various alternatives to the dangerous and unconstitutional Expropriation Act of 2024 that are better conducive to constitutional land reform.

Contributors

Martin van Staden

Head of Policy

Share

Fund the FMF

Help the FMF to promote the rule of law, personal liberty, and economic freedom.

For more content like this, Subscribe to the FMF

Dr Martin van Staden

Dr Martin van Staden is the Head of Policy at the Free Market Foundation, and serves additionally on the boards of the Foundation, Rule of Law Project, and Free Speech Union SA. He has an earned Doctor of Laws (LL.D.) from the University of Pretoria. Van Staden has been associated with the FMF since 2015. Visit www.martinvanstaden.com for more information.

View all articles

The views expressed in the article are the author’s and are not necessarily shared by the members of the Foundation. This article may be republished without prior consent but with acknowledgement to the author.

RELATED ARTICLES

WATCH OUR LATEST VIDEO

FUND THE FMF

Help the FMF to promote the rule of law, personal liberty, and economic freedom.