
Expropriation without compensation is dangerous political theatre
Of course, the current owners of the property, as a matter of right, are required to be compensated if they must part with the property.

Of course, the current owners of the property, as a matter of right, are required to be compensated if they must part with the property.

This does not just limit lobbying; it obliterates the industry’s ability to participate in civic life, “directly or indirectly.”

A psychologically stateproof community would not wait for happy-go-lucky metro cops.

CASE STUDY Expropriation of property without compensation: the case of South Africa and international worst practice Authored by the FMF’s Head of Policy Martin van

This means that notions of repeal will soon be dismissed as folly.

Knocking on the doors of DA leaders in the GNU is to be expected.

In reality, these concepts are inextricably linked: there is no liberalism without the rule of law, and there is no rule of law without liberalism.

The Brussels effect disadvantages the developing world anew, ignoring desperate struggles with poverty, government corruption, and weaker economies.

“Do not blame us – this is the responsibility of the South African Police Service.”