The notion that access to information is a fundamental civil right lay behind the long campaign for a British Freedom of Information Act. But since it came into force in 2005, the FOIA has not always been treated with reverence, says the Economist.
For example:
The government is using such frivolous applications as part of the rationale for making it harder to get information. Requests can already be refused if they cost more than £600 ($1,170), including the time spent hunting for files, but now the Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA) wants to make it more difficult:
But while officials cite rising costs, others see a darker motive, says the Economist. Maurice Frankel, director of the Campaign for Freedom of Information, says that the measures will cut down on precisely the complicated and time-consuming requests that prove most embarrassing for ministers. What’s more, the savings are estimated to be around £12 million ($23.4 million) a year; a sum barely perceptible to a government that expects to get through £555 billion ($1.08 trillion) of taxpayers’ money this year.
Source: Editorial, Every expense spared: The government thinks coming clean costs too much, Economist, December 19, 2006.
For text (subscription required): http://www.economist.com/world/britain/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_RQVJVSQ
For more on International Issues: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=26
Policy Bulletin/ 16 January 2007




