The Laffer curve illustrates the idea that above a certain tax rate, cuts to the rate cause the tax base to expand sufficiently for revenues to increase. At 35 per cent, the U.S. corporate tax rate seems to be above that rate, and thus in a strong Laffer zone, says Chris Edwards, Director of Tax Policy Studies at the Cato Institute.
The U.S. statutory rate is the second highest of the 30 nations in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and by one estimate, the effective rate is the highest, yet U.S. corporate tax revenues as a share of gross domestic product (GDP) are below average.
Economists Alex Brill and Kevin Hassett looked at these relationships in the OECD for 1980 to 2005:
In another recent study Jack Mintz found similar results for Canada using a sample of OECD countries:
A modest corporate tax rate cut would likely result in no government revenue losses in the long-term. However, the goal of policy should be to maximise growth, not revenues, and thus a much larger rate cut is in order. Edwards suggests cutting the corporate tax rate to 15 per cent within a major overhaul of the tax code. That wouldn’t quite match Ireland’s 12.5 per cent corporate rate, but it would reduce tax avoidance, make the United States a premier location for international investment, and supercharge American growth and innovation.
Source: Chris Edwards, Corporate Tax Laffer Curve, Cato Institute, Tax & Budget Bulletin No. 49, November 2007.
For text: http://www.cato.org/pubs/tbb/tbb_1107_49.pdf
For more on Taxes: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=20
FMF Policy Bulletin/ 20 November 2007
