The “precautionary principle,” is being used to justify arbitrary restrictions on the use of new technologies on the grounds that they might be harmful in spite of a lack of scientific evidence that any harm is actually likely.
There are at least 19 different definitions for “precautionary principle” in various international agreements and statements from different groups. Some would entail impossible-to-meet “zero risk” standards.
New technologies such as genetic modification of plants entail new risks, say experts, but they often enable us to control old risks better. For example, gas-fired heating entails a risk of explosions from leaks, but it reduces the risk of lung diseases resulting from coal-burning fires. But coal fires themselves reduced the risk of death from hypothermia.
Ironically, by preventing us from using newer, safer technologies, the precautionary principle can both limit our ability to cope with the risks we already face and make life more uncertain, undermining our capacity to cope with risks that might arise in the future.
Source: Julian Morris, ed., “Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle,” November 2000, Institute of Economic Affairs, 2, Lord North Street, Westminster, London, SW1P 3LB, UK, (020) 7799 8900.
For text http://www.iea.org.uk/books/risk.htm
For more on Risks http://www.ncpa.org/pi/enviro/envdex2.html#b




