Politicians have shifted their focus from the threats posed by global warming to creating green jobs. Under the guise of creating a “clean energy” market, political leaders can claim they are “investing” in the economy, creating new jobs and saving the planet, say Nick Sibilla, a research assistant, and Todd Wynn, vice president, at the Cascade Policy Institute.
This rebranded version of the climate change strategy into a jobs creation approach is flawed for several reasons.
The term “green jobs” is a vague and vacuous concept. Indeed, in some states, employers define what jobs are “green” in self-reporting surveys without any independent verification.
The push to subsidise green jobs is based on faulty economics.
Assumptions for job growth are inaccurate or downright false.
In the end, environmentalists should not base their calls to action on specious claims of job creation. Additionally, too many clean jobs depend on government largess for their existence, with the largest sectors of the clean economy being either state employees or recipients of corporate welfare. This folly of investing in clean jobs to induce growth is best symbolised by the case of a city on the verge of bankruptcy, say Sibilla and Wynn.
Source: Nick Sibilla and Todd Wynn, The Dirty Secret behind Clean Jobs, Cascade Policy Institute, August 2011.
For text: http://cascadepolicy.org/pdf/pub/CleanJobsReport8.22.11.pdf
For more on Environment Issues: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=31
First published by the National Center for Policy Analysis, United States
FMF Policy Bulletin/ 06 September 2011




