By law, in most countries, individuals do not have to repay money that others fraudulently borrow in their name. Similarly, a corporation is not liable for contracts that the chief executive officer enters without the authority to bind the firm. But international law does not exempt citizens of a dictatorship from repaying a debt incurred by a dictator for personal and nefarious purposes.
One potential solution to this problem is for the international community to empower an independent institution to assess a regime’s legitimacy and to declare any sovereign debt subsequently incurred by an illegitimate regime “odious” and thus not the obligation of successor governments.
Two enforcement mechanisms could help eliminate lending to odious regimes.
Donors could refuse to give aid to a country that, in effect, was handing the aid over to banks that have illegitimate claims. If the foreign aid were valuable enough, successor governments would have incentives to repudiate odious loans, so banks would refrain from originating them.
Source: Michael Kremer and Seema Jayachandran, Odious Debt: When Dictators Borrow, Who Repays the Loan? Spring 2003, Vol.21, No.2, Brookings Review, Brookings Institution.
For text http://www.brook.edu/press/review/spring2003/kremer.htm
For more on Third World Problems http://www.ncpa.org/iss/int/
FMF Policy Bulletin\15 April 2003




