In spite of seemingly convincing data, public transit does not solve congestion problems nor is it cost-effective, according to the Heritage Foundation. Wendell Cox and senior economist Randal O’Toole analysed the Texas Transportation Institute’s 2003 Annual Urban Mobility Report and discovered discrepancies with the data.
One of the problems with the report, notes O’Toole and Cox, is that the “positive” results of mass transit reported by TTI are skewed to a few major urbanized areas. For example, New York City is weighted heavily (Manhattan residents must have mass transit to get around), but 36 percent of the time savings attributed to mass transit is in New York City, with just five other urban regions comprising an additional 29 percent of travel time saved.
Source: Wendell Cox and Randal O’Toole, The Contribution of Highways and Transit to Congestion Relief: A Realistic View, Heritage Foundation, Backgrounder no. 1721, January 27, 2004. 2003 Urban Mobility Study, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M.
For text: http://www.heritage.org/Research/UrbanIssues/bg1721.cfm
For TTI report
For more on Transit & other federal spending http://www.ncpa.org/iss/bud/
FMF Policy Bulletin/ 4 May 2004




