Back when people first started complaining about the imminent disappearance of U.S. manufacturing, the proposed solution especially popular among Democrats was an “industrial policy.” The idea was that some government agency, modelled after Japan’s Ministry of International Trade and Industry, would pick industrial winners and losers, nurturing the former with subsidies and trade protection, while humanely killing off the latter.
An industrial policy is unnecessary, says Bruce Bartlett, because a new U.S. Commerce Department report presents ample evidence that manufacturing in the United States is quite healthy:
The Commerce Department study concludes that manufacturing’s problems, such as they are, stem mainly from two factors:
The new Bush industrial policy may be nothing more than minor election year politicking. But it’s still a bad idea, says
Bartlett.
Source: Bruce Bartlett, U.S. Manufacturing is Quite Healthy, National Centre for Policy Analysis, January 20, 2004; based upon: Manufacturing in America: A Comprehensive Strategy to Address the Challenges to U.S. Manufacturers, U.S. Department of Commerce, January 2004.
For text http://www.ncpa.org/edo/bb/2004/bb-20040121.htm
For study text http://www.commerce.gov/DOC_MFG_Report_Complete.pdf
For more on Economic Issues http://www.ncpa.org/iss/eco/
FMF Policy Bulletin\27 January 2004




