Gun-control advocates embraced historian Michael Bellesiles’ “Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture.” In the book, which won the prestigious Bancroft Prize, Bellesiles claimed there were very few guns in early America, and that most of the guns that did exist were old and broken.
Bellesiles claimed to have counted 11,170 estate inventories from colonial times to the old West and found that few estates included guns. However, researchers are questioning his methods, his evidence and his mathematics:
Researchers James Lindgren and Justin Heather have identified many other errors:
Furthermore, says Melissa Seckora of National Review, “Bellesiles has egregious problems in the areas of homicide data, gun censuses, reports on militia arms, hunting accounts, travel accounts, the opinions of the anti-Federalists, and laws governing guns.”
According to the Boston Globe (October 3) the head of Emory Universitys history department has demanded that Bellesiles write a detailed defence of his book. But his publisher, Knopf, has not withdrawn the new paperback edition.
Source: Melissa Seckora, Disarming America, National Review, October 15, 2001; see also James Lindgren and Justin Lee Heather, Counting Guns in Early America, Northwestern Law & Economics Research Paper No. 01-1, Northwestern University School of Law, February 20, 2001.
For NR text http://www.nationalreview.com/15oct01/seckora101501.shtml
For Lindgren/Heather text http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=268583
For more on Guns & Crime http://www.ncpa.org/iss/cri/
FMF\30 October 2001




