(Send some greens along on the next shuttle flight!)
After 2 1/2 years and $1.4 billion spent to make the space shuttle safer, the same problem that doomed Columbia also plagued Discovery, says Investor’s Business Daily (IBD). Has environmentalism doomed the space shuttle?
Spurred by pressure from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), NASA stopped using Freon a fluorocarbon environmentalists claim damages the ozone layer in the manufacturing of its thermal-insulating foam. The space agency switched to a more politically correct foam even though it was known to be less sticky and more brittle under extreme temperatures.
Consider:
Malcolm Ross, who studied asbestos as a research scientist for 41 years at the U.S. Geological Survey, noted that the Air Force’s Titan 34-D rockets had 50 straight launch successes before replacing the asbestos-based putty; then, at about the same time as the Challenger disaster, had two launch failures with the green substitute.
Source: Editorial, Green for Launch, Investor’s Business Daily, August 2, 2005.
For text: http://www.investors.com/editorial/issues03.asp?v=8/2
For more on Environmental Education: http://eteam.ncpa.org/policy/Environmental_Education/
FMF Policy Bulletin/ 09 August 2005




