For some years, liberal groups in America like ACORN (Association of Community Organisations for Reform Now) have pushed hard to get so-called living wage laws enacted in cities and counties throughout the country. More than 60 jurisdictions have done so since the first in Baltimore in 1994.
The point is that it is silly to assume every worker is the sole wage earner in a four-person family, as living wage advocates do.
Living wage campaigns are mainly fronts for municipal employee unions who want to raise labour costs for potential private competitors.
In fact, a new study by economist David Neumark finds that existing government employees are the primary beneficiaries of living wage laws.
Taxpayers foot the bill for the higher wages. They may pay again when businesses relocate elsewhere, thus reducing the tax base.
Source: Bruce Bartlett, senior fellow, National Center for Policy Analysis, March 20, 2002; see David Neumark, How Living Wage Laws Affect Low-Wage Workers and Low Income Families, March 2002, Public Policy Institute of California.
For PPIC text http://www.ppic.org/publications/PPIC156/ppic156.alltext.pdf
For more on “Living Wage” Regulations http://www.ncpa.org/iss/min
FMF Policy Bulletin\26 March 2002




