If human use of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) is largely responsible for global warming and this warming is reasonably likely to cause harms that society would like to avoid or minimise the technologies that fuel the world’s economies must be reassessed. In particular, nuclear power could be the best choice to reduce the climate change risks posed by fossil fuels, says Pete Geddes, executive vice president of the Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment (FREE), and H. Sterling Burnett, a senior fellow with the National Center for Policy Analysis.
Despite opposition, nuclear power currently produces much of the electric power in developed countries:
Combating climate change requires creative thinking about the world’s energy needs. For the short to medium term, fossil fuels will continue to meet most of the world’s energy demand, but nuclear power holds the most promise as a clean, practical alternative that could help satisfy the world economy’s growing demand for energy while slowing the growth in demand for CO2-emitting fossil fuels, say Geddes and Burnett.
Source: Pete Geddes and H. Sterling Burnett, Constructive Thinking about Climate Change, Part I: Energy, National Center for Policy Analysis, Brief Analysis No. 564, July 27, 2006.
For text: http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba/ba564/
For more on Nuclear Energy: http://eteam.ncpa.org/issues/?c=nuclear-energy
For more on Energy Issues: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=22
FMF Policy Bulletin/ 01 August 2006
