Take the government’s proposed Renewable Heat Incentive, the costs of which could, by 2030, outweigh its benefits by as much as £13 billion ($20 billion).
Equally questionable is Britain’s enthusiasm for solar panels: Last year, solar’s contribution to the grid averaged 2.3 megawatts so minuscule that it was barely a 1,000th of the output of one large coal-fired power station, says Booker.
Two years ago, the British Parliament voted all but unanimously for the Climate Change Act, which commits Britain, uniquely in the world, to cutting its CO2 emissions by 80 per cent by 2050. This will cost up to £18 billion (about $28 billion) a year, or £734 billion (about $1.1 trillion) in total.
But, of course, none of this will have any impact on reducing overall CO2 emissions. Britain contributes less than 2 per cent to the global total, while China’s emissions alone increase by more than that every year, says Booker.
Source: Christopher Booker, Britain’s Energy Policy Is in Crisis, Guardian (UK), September 18, 2010.
For more on Energy Issues: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=22
First published by the National Center for Policy Analysis, United States
FMF Policy Bulletin/ 28 September 2010




