Anti-dumping cases are more successful than before in the U.S.

Articles-2

Many American businesses convince the federal government to erect trade barriers by claiming foreign competitors are selling goods (dumping) in the United States at artificially low prices. These anti-dumping cases are becoming more and more prevalent in American trade policy. A new paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research argues that the number of anti-dumping cases is not growing, but that they are resulting in trade protection more often.

Contrary to the conventional wisdom, the author finds that the number of anti-dumping investigations in the 1930s, 1950s, and 1960s was roughly equivalent to the current rate. However, after 1980, the same number of cases resulted in more trade barriers:

  • Most pre-1980 cases were rejected at an early stage and only five percent of cases resulted in a favourable ruling for U.S. industry.
  • In contrast, nearly all of post-1980 cases receive hearings and half result in favourable rulings for domestic industry.
  • Another difference is that contemporary cases usually charge that the dumping involved imports from several countries simultaneously.

    Legislative changes caused these differences, says NBER:

  • In 1980, the U.S. Congress gave the Commerce Department authority over reviewing anti-dumping cases, because they felt it was more sympathetic to domestic business than the Treasury Department.
  • In 1984, the International Trade Commission began to add up the total value of the imports involved when calculating harm.
  • This shift motivated companies to file antidumping complaints that focused on many countries.

    This combination of a particularly favourable venue and the shift to multi-country complaints appears to have dramatically altered the dynamic in favour of domestic industries alleging harm, says NBER.

    Source: Matthew Davis, Antidumping in Historical Perspective, NBER Digest, January 2005; based upon: Douglas Irwin, Antidumping in Historical Perspective, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 10582, June 2004.

    For text: http://www.nber.org/digest/jan05/w10582.html

    For abstract: http://papers.nber.org/papers/w10582

    For more on Tariffs and Other Trade Barriers: http://www.ncpa.org/pd/trade/trade.html

    FMF Policy Bulletin/ 12 April 2005

  • Share

    Fund the FMF

    Help FMF to promote the rule of law, personal liberty, and economic freedom.

    For more content like this, Subscribe to FMF