Many American businesses convince the federal government to erect trade barriers by claiming foreign competitors are selling goods (dumping) in the United States at artificially low prices. These anti-dumping cases are becoming more and more prevalent in American trade policy. A new paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research argues that the number of anti-dumping cases is not growing, but that they are resulting in trade protection more often.
Contrary to the conventional wisdom, the author finds that the number of anti-dumping investigations in the 1930s, 1950s, and 1960s was roughly equivalent to the current rate. However, after 1980, the same number of cases resulted in more trade barriers:
Legislative changes caused these differences, says NBER:
This combination of a particularly favourable venue and the shift to multi-country complaints appears to have dramatically altered the dynamic in favour of domestic industries alleging harm, says NBER.
Source: Matthew Davis, Antidumping in Historical Perspective, NBER Digest, January 2005; based upon: Douglas Irwin, Antidumping in Historical Perspective, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 10582, June 2004.
For text: http://www.nber.org/digest/jan05/w10582.html
For abstract: http://papers.nber.org/papers/w10582
For more on Tariffs and Other Trade Barriers: http://www.ncpa.org/pd/trade/trade.html
FMF Policy Bulletin/ 12 April 2005




