Activist demands are targeting banks to the detriment of the poor

News-5

Environmental activists could be hurting Third World countries by pressuring banks not to lend money to development projects that will benefit the world’s poor, says Neil Hrab of the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

Banks caving in to the demands of environmental groups are doing little to improve the lives of the poor, says Hrab. Consequently, many foreign governments are perturbed over what they view as “foreign meddling” by activist groups:

  • In 2002, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) such as Friends of the Earth Network criticised Uganda’s government for proceeding with a dam project – President Museveni insisted it would be built, with or without private companies.
  • In 2001, Ecuador was targeted by NGOs to drop its plans for an oil and gas development, prompting Ecuador’s president to accuse NGOs of placing more importance on wildlife and trees than on jobs and food for his country’s citizens.

    Indeed, Third World governments are becoming more outspoken in defending their projects, and some are looking at self-financing when banks refuse loans.

    Hrab questions the effect that turning down such loans will have on banks, especially if developing countries view them as siding with anti-growth NGOs. Banks may wish to help preserve the environment, but should not do so at the risk of hurting the poor or jeopardising their own reputations, he says.

    Source: Neil Hrab, No-Growthers’ ‘Green Line’ Shouldn’t Deter Bank Loans, Investor’s Business Daily, June 17, 2004.
    For more on International Issues http://eteam.ncpa.org/policy/International_Issues/

    FMF Policy Bulletin/ 6 July 2004

  • Share

    Fund the FMF

    Help FMF to promote the rule of law, personal liberty, and economic freedom.

    For more content like this, Subscribe to FMF