The word “nuclear” still sends a frisson. Images of Hiroshima and Chernobyl and the partial meltdown at Three Mile Island in 1979 and waste in dangerous perpetuity, not to mention proliferation and dirty bombs, says Roger Cohen, a columnist with the New York Times.
But the lesson of the post-9/11 world is that we have to get over our fears, especially irrational ones:
True, detractors have a point that wild cost overruns on several nuclear power plants and on the planned Yucca Mountain Repository in Nevada for radioactive waste, which will cost some $30 billion to open, have suggested there may be better ways to spend money on energy diversification and saving.
But the French, with the cleanest air in the industrialised world, have an answer. Their standardised design, expedited approval process, and improving technology (evident in the third-generation Evolutionary Pressurised Reactor) offer streamlined routes to cost-saving. They have also drastically reduced waste by reprocessing most of it into fuel, a long-term answer to the disposal issue, says Cohen.
Source: Roger Cohen, America Needs France’s Atomic Anne, New York Times, January 24, 2008.
For text: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/24/opinion/24cohen.html
For more on Nuclear Energy: http://eteam.ncpa.org/issues/?c=nuclear-energy
For more on Energy Issues: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=22
FMF Policy Bulletin/ 05 February 2008
