In dealing with global warming, the world needs to think more rationally about how to tackle the challenge, says Bjorn Lomborg, professor at Copenhagen Business School.
Take flooding, for example:
The picture is the same for other “disasters”:
Such a nuanced look at the good and bad of global warming gives Lomborg a chance to pursue his bigger theme: Anti-warming policies (like those of the Kyoto Protocol) that require energy taxes or other checks on economic dynamism are inefficient and even harmful. They serve as short-term ways of dealing with what is a complex and long-term problem. They cost a lot now and yet do little to reduce global temperatures in 100 years’ time.
Source: Kimberley Strassel, A Calm Voice in a Heated Debate, Wall Street Journal, September 13, 2007.
For text: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118963642410225658.html
For more on Global Warming Impacts and Responses: http://eteam.ncpa.org/issues/?c=impacts-and-responses
For more on Global Warming: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=32
FMF Policy Bulletin/ 25 September 2007




