
For those at the back: “Just and equitable” compensation is (above) market value
“Market value is not the constitutional standard” is a common argument in the discourse around compensation for expropriated property.

“Market value is not the constitutional standard” is a common argument in the discourse around compensation for expropriated property.

Today, the worry is not simply rhetorical: in fact, the DA is – despite protestations to the contrary from many in the rank and file – assimilating into the ANC policy ecosystem.

It is clear that the Commission has been influenced by the EU’s regulatory dispensation when it came to its recommendations aimed at correcting impediments to competition.

Nowhere is it more in-your-face than in the political statements (too often pooh-poohed) made by some of the country’s most powerful politicians.

The Constitution is explicit about precisely what the state may and must do to redress measures for past injustice, but in this the political elite shows little interest.

Harber’s attacks lack substance, hence why I have in detail explained why I fear he is engaged in a “vibe-check” rather than a “fact-check.”

Godongwana should choose something more complicated to lie about. This is too easy.

Our righteousness does not automatically translate into tangible solutions.

The state does not respect its citizens. Individuals are forced to respect the state.

People like Malema and Mngxitama would have long been behind bars in civilised societies, but remain at large – MPs in fact – in SA.